Skip to main content

Doctrines, Christian

 Subject
Subject Source: Library of Congress Subject Headings

Found in 94 Collections and/or Records:

Letter from N.D. Pendleton to Rev. Carl Theophilus Odhner

 Item
Identifier: RG.004.01
Scope and Contents Handwritten letter from N.D. Pendleton to Rev. Carl Theophilus Odhner. No Date. Pendleton informs Odhner that he will visit Bryn Athyn again shortly to attend the Consistory meeting. During his visit, he hopes to discuss aspects of Swedenborg’s scientific philosophy which have been on his mind. He writes, “In fact I am again up to my neck, if not deeper, in Swedenborg’s science. The occasion for this recent plunge is a certain startling proposition, concerning the nature of the Sun as...
Dates: 1890 - 1937

Letter from N.D. Pendleton to Rev. Carl Theophilus Odhner

 Item
Identifier: RG.004.01
Scope and Contents Handwritten letter from N.D. Pendleton to Rev. Carl Theophilus Odhner. Date: July 6th, no year. Pendleton discusses Swedenborg’s writings on the metaphysics of the soul as they relate to his criticism of Odhner’s paper. He writes, “You will recall that on the occasion of the reading of your first paper I said that Swedenborg had stated that the “pure simple was neither Infinite nor finite but an indefinite eus(?)” and that you challenged me to show the statement. Unfortunately I could not...
Dates: 1890 - 1937

Letter from N.D. Pendleton to Rev. Carl Theophilus Odhner , 1906-03-07

 Item
Identifier: RG.004.01
Scope and Contents Handwritten letter from N.D. Pendleton to Rev. Carl Theophilus Odhner. Pendleton thanks Odhner for his letter of yesterday with news from Bryn Athyn. He comments, “I have always opposed vaccinations as a matter of course. The compulsory variety adds injustice to injury. . . As to voluntary vaccination, I consider that the principle involved is a choice between evils, which every man must be free to make according to his judgement.” He asks if he is correct in understanding Odhner to say...
Dates: 1906-03-07

Letter from N.D. Pendleton to Rev. Carl Theophilus Odhner (?)

 Item
Identifier: RG.004.01
Scope and Contents Handwritten letter from N.D. Pendleton, most likely to Rev. Carl Theophilus Odhner. Addressed to “My Dear Boy.” No Date. Pendleton thanks the Odhners for their last letter with an “excellent picture.” Of the picture, Pendleton writes, “Tell ‘Lulu’ that her’s though good, does not quite do her justice. And as for yours, there is a mingling of genial humor and fierce determination which is entirely characteristic and altogether delightful. A sort of love for friends and terror for enemies...
Dates: 1890 - 1937

Letter from N.D. Pendleton to Rev. Charles E. Doering, 1907-11-17

 Item
Identifier: RG.004.01
Scope and Contents Handwritten letter from N.D. Pendleton to Rev. Charles E. Doering. Pendleton discusses his change in perception as to the quality and character of Miss (Lilian) Beekman’s work. He had been doubtful about her work because of a sense that she was “sensualizing” spiritual doctrine, but over the summer he had time to read some 12 or 14 of her lectures and was surprised. The turning point for him was her doctrine about “infilling spheres” which gave him a new perception of things. He writes, “I...
Dates: 1907-11-17

Letter from N.D. Pendleton to Rev. Eldred Edward Iungerich, 1929-05-06

 Item
Identifier: RG.004.01
Scope and Contents Typed letter from N.D. Pendleton to Rev. Eldred Edward Iungerich in Pittsburgh, PA, USA. Pendleton encloses a check to cover Iungerich’s traveling expenses. Pendleton reports that he spent the weekend at Toms River with Otho (W. Heilman), Leonard (E. Gyllenhaal?), and Randolph (W. Childs?). Hugo (Odhner) is doing as well as could be expected, although he apparently has typhoid symptoms. He is under the care of Dr. Olds and two nurses, and they are doing everything that can be done, except...
Dates: 1929-05-06

Letter from N.D. Pendleton to Rev. Eldred Edward Iungerich, 1928-11-05

 Item
Identifier: RG.004.01
Scope and Contents Typed letter from N.D. Pendleton to Rev. Eldred Edward Iungerich in Pittsburgh, PA, USA. Pendleton discusses his thoughts on representations/correspondences of parts of the worship service; “It is impossible for me to object to the statement that the Word should be present with the elements. It may be said that It is present at every point of the chancel where the action is focused. The question is as to whether It should be represented as being present at these points, derivatively from...
Dates: 1928-11-05

Letter from N.D. Pendleton to Rev. Eldred Edward Iungerich, 1928-10-29

 Item
Identifier: RG.004.01
Scope and Contents Typed letter from N.D. Pendleton to Rev. Eldred Edward Iungerich in Pittsburgh, PA, USA. Pendleton discusses the administration of Holy Supper during his recent visit to Pittsburgh for their district Assembly. He agrees with Iungerich that a series of mistakes were made, and Pendleton will consider Iungerich’s suggestions regarding the order and sequence of administration. Pendleton recommends a blue chasuble for Iungerich to wear as a means of distinguishing and honoring the Holy Supper...
Dates: 1928-10-29

Letter from N.D. Pendleton to Rev. Eldred Edward Iungerich, 1920-04-06

 Item
Identifier: RG.004.01
Scope and Contents Typed letter from N.D. Pendleton to Rev. Eldred Edward Iungerich in Bryn Ahtyn, PA, USA. General Church letterhead. A second typed copy attached. Handwritten copy also attached. Pendleton engages in a doctrinal debate with Iungerich about the Lord’s glorification and the nature of spiritual matter as presented in the Principia. Pendleton writes, “Is it fully satisfactory to you to see the spiritual as simply a rapid orbital movement of a material unit, say of third finites? . . . I do...
Dates: 1920-04-06

Letter from N.D. Pendleton to Rev. Eldred Edward Iungerich, 1919-12-31

 Item
Identifier: RG.004.01
Scope and Contents

Typed letter from N.D. Pendleton to Rev. Eldred Edward Iungerich in Bryn Athyn, PA, USA. General Church letterhead. Handwritten copy attached. Pendleton writes a 7 point response to Iungerich’s paper. Most of Pendleton’s points are in disagreement with Iungerich’s arguments. The arguments center around the physical nature of the Divine Human, whether it was made Divine via transmutation or substitution. Names mentioned: Dr. (Nathan Clark) Burnham, Miss (Lillian Grace) Beekman

Dates: 1919-12-31